CAS NO: | 1448867-41-1 |
包装 | 价格(元) |
10mM (in 1mL DMSO) | 电议 |
1mg | 电议 |
5mg | 电议 |
10mg | 电议 |
50mg | 电议 |
100mg | 电议 |
Cas No. | 1448867-41-1 |
别名 | NVP-HDM201; HDM201 |
Canonical SMILES | O=C1N(C2=CC(Cl)=CN(C)C2=O)[C@@H](C3=CC=C(Cl)C=C3)C4=C1N=C(C5=CN=C(OC)N=C5OC)N4C(C)C |
分子式 | C26H24Cl2N6O4 |
分子量 | 555.41 |
溶解度 | DMSO : ≥ 56.75 mg/mL (102.18 mM) |
储存条件 | Store at -20°C |
General tips | For obtaining a higher solubility , please warm the tube at 37 ℃ and shake it in the ultrasonic bath for a while. |
Shipping Condition | Evaluation sample solution : ship with blue ice All other available size: ship with RT , or blue ice upon request |
产品描述 | NVP-HDM201 (HDM201) is a potent and highly specific MDM-2/p53 inhibitor currently under phase I clinical trial. NVP-HDM201 disrupts both human and murine TP53- MDM2 interactions, with nanomolar cellular IC50 values, blocking TP53 degradation[1]. NVP-HDM201 is an imidazolopyrrolidinone analogue, showing a very advantageous in vivo profile. NVP-HDM201 has recently entered Phase 1 clinical trials in cancer patients[2]. Constitutive PB mutagenesis in Arf-/- mice provides a collection of spontaneous tumors with characterized insertional genetic landscapes. Tumors are allografted in large cohorts of mice to assess the pharmacologic effects of NVP-HDM201. Sixteen out of 21 allograft models are sensitive to NVP-HDM201 but ultimately relapse under treatment. A comparison of tumors with acquired resistance to NVP-HDM201 and untreated tumors identified 87 genes that are differentially and significantly targeted by the PB transposon[1]. NVP-HDM201 administered either daily at a low dose or once at a high dose revealed a differentiated engagement of the p53 molecular response. In contrast to the daily low dose treatment regimen, the single high dose NVP-HDM201 regimen results in a rapid and dramatic induction of p53-dependent PUMA expression and apoptosis. This is consistent with the finding that a single high dose NVP-HDM201 treatment, administered orally or intravenously, results in a robust and sustained tumor regression. Overall, both daily and once every 3 weeks dosing regimen shows comparable long term efficacy in preclinical studies. The ongoing clinical trial is currently designed to compare both dosing regimens with regard to efficacy and tolerability[3]. References: |